<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grammar Software &#187; English writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/topics/english-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Style Isn&#8217;t Just About Economy In Language</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/style-economy-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/style-economy-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy of language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conciseness is among the qualities that efficient writers are able to endow their writing with.  Talking about a subject as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conciseness is among the qualities that <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/efficient-writer/">efficient writers</a> are able to endow their writing with.  Talking about a subject as simply as possible using the fewest words will always be regarded as the ideal way to write.  In more than a few instances, though, minimizing isn&#8217;t the only valid concern: you need to write in a style that works for the subject and the type of writing you&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>The best example of conciseness is the news story.  Using an inverted pyramid format, it dispenses of all the main talking points quickly, then spends the rest of the piece filling in the details.  All throughout, sentences and paragraphs are kept short to make reading effortless, with all pertinent information easily found within the text.</p>
<p>As you can tell, not all prose will work best when written like a news story.  Hence, the need to write in a certain style, telling the story or discussing the subject in a way that&#8217;s on point.</p>
<p>A detective novel, for instance, often gets written with a hard-edged style, just as a human interest piece will frequently be covered with a compassionate tone.  In both of those cases, the writers consciously adopted a style &#8212; one that they felt will be a proper fit for the piece.</p>
<p>Any style you adopt will suffer without economy of language.  Unless, of course, you&#8217;re intentionally setting out to write overwrought, excessively wordy and convoluted prose.   That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s important to work on both, along with the clarity and correctness of your language, to achieve the best results with your writing tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/style-economy-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Characteristics Of Good Word Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/characteristics-good-word-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/characteristics-good-word-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good word choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word choice is critical to good writing.   Since your words are the vehicle that conveys your thoughts and ideas, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word choice is critical to good writing.   Since your words are the vehicle that conveys your thoughts and ideas, the choices you make will often determine the kinds of results you get.</p>
<p>When writing, you want to choose the best word to express the meaning you will convey.  If you leave room for even the slightest misinterpretation, you risk leading the reader down the wrong path.  While not life or death, it certainly warrants enough attention if you care about what the reader takes away from your piece.</p>
<p>The best word for the job has several characteristics:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>It&#8217;s clear.   The meaning of a word should be clear.  If it can be taken to mean anything other than what you intend, it&#8217;s probably not the best choice for this instance.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s precise.  The less precise a word is, the more room you give for the reader misinterpret your ideas.  Saying a dispute is &#8220;big,&#8221; for instance, can be taken to mean that it involves a lot of people, a lot of money or a lot time to resolve.    Each reader is bound to have their own interpretation simply because you used an imprecise statement.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s familiar.  If your audience requires a dictionary to understand the words you use in a piece, then you&#8217;re not making the best word choices.  You don&#8217;t have to dumb down your writing &#8212; you just need to make word choices that jive with who you&#8217;re writing for.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s appropriate.  Some word choices that are appropriate to an audience of young music fans may not exactly sit well with a readership of middle-aged doctors.    Same goes for a whole load of audiences.  Choose words that are suitable to your target readers if you want to avoid offending, angering or insulting them.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/characteristics-good-word-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When To Use Abstract Nouns</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/abstract-nouns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/abstract-nouns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract nouns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concrete writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you&#8217;ve probably been taught, good writing means avoiding abstract nouns whenever possible.  It&#8217;s sound advice &#8212; using concrete nouns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you&#8217;ve probably been taught, good writing means avoiding abstract nouns whenever possible.  It&#8217;s sound advice &#8212; using concrete nouns and verbs simply lead to clearer, more effective writing.</p>
<p>However, abstract nouns do have their place.  With some sentences, in fact, they can prove essential.  One thing to note, though: a desire to sound more &#8220;academic&#8221; and &#8220;formal&#8221; isn&#8217;t a valid reason to rely on abstract nouns.</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Abstract nouns can be used to make references to a previous sentence.  When referring to a protagonist&#8217;s previous actions in a story, for instance, it makes sense to write &#8220;these past decisions&#8221; or &#8220;these rash actions.&#8221;  Same with writing &#8220;the previous arguments&#8221; to refer to the points laid out in a previous paragraph of an essay.  In both cases, the use of abstract nouns may be valid if you&#8217;re discussing elements previously presented.</li>
<li>Abstract nouns can lead to concision.  There are some occasions when abstract nouns are just more concise than their concrete alternatives.  For instance, it&#8217;s shorter to write &#8220;his documentation of the event,&#8221; rather than &#8220;what he documented during the event.&#8221;</li>
<li>Abstract nouns can be a central concept to your sentence.  While we don&#8217;t recommend these situations, they can happen.   Timeless concepts like love, revolution and courage can be important elements to many writing topics, after all.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/abstract-nouns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using The Tricolon In Your Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/tricolon-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/tricolon-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetorical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricolon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In writing, tricolon is a word that refers to a series of three parallel items,  whether they are words, phrases [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In writing, tricolon is a word that refers to a series of three parallel items,  whether they are words, phrases or clauses.    While that sounds like a simple enough structure, it&#8217;s actually one of the most powerful devices you can employ when you  want your writing to exhibit a strong rhetorical effect.</p>
<p>Look at these examples from popular literature and songs:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>&#8220;&#8230;bewitched, bothered and bewildered&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;Instead of language we have jargon; instead of principles, slogans; and instead of genuine ideas, bright suggestions.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;It&#8217;s a bird, it&#8217;s a plane… it&#8217;s Superman&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;&#8230;life, libery and the pursuit of happiness.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>There are countless more examples of the triumvirate pairing such as those above.  In each of those cases, the three-in-a-series approach was used to heighten the impact of the lines.  Imagine, for instance, how memorable those lines will be if they had two or five elements instead:  &#8220;Bewitched, bothered, bewildered, becharmed and beguiled&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite carry the same punch, does it?</p>
<p>Why does three work better than other combinations?  Personally, I think they do because three is just long enough to avoid ending a series abruptly (a list with two items doesn&#8217;t really feel like a list), all while being short enough to avoid droning off into a monotonous rant.  Plus, most people can remember three items easily.  Add more and recall can get dicey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/tricolon-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Achieve Sentence Fluency</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/achieve-sentence-fluency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/achieve-sentence-fluency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence fluency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing flow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sentences can be written with correct grammar and spelling, yet still manage to sound awkward.  In many ways, that fluency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sentences can be written with correct grammar and spelling, yet still manage to sound awkward.  In many ways, that fluency in their sentence construction is what sets good writers apart from bad ones.</p>
<p>Some writing software will be able to help you on this end, especially when it comes to passive constructions and similar easy-to-spot maladies.  If you want to beef up your sentence fluency, though, there are things you can start doing yourself to make them happen.</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Vary how your sentences start.    Starting sentences the same way (e.g. always leading with &#8220;the&#8221;) is the type of writing you&#8217;ll expect from an elementary student and that&#8217;s exactly how your writing looks like when you go this route.</li>
<li>Vary the length of your sentences.  Short simple sentences are fine when read in a list.  For conveying complex thought fluently, though, they&#8217;re rarely enough.  Use different sentence lengths and types to keep your paragraphs from sounding stilted.</li>
<li>Test it by reading aloud.  The best test for how your sentences sound is to read them aloud.  If they sound awkward, a rewrite should probably be in order.</li>
<li>Limit the length to 30 words or less.  Run-on sentences tend to occur with constructions that extend past the 30-word limit.  If you want to avoid that, then cap your sentences at 30 words.</li>
<li>Minimize repetition of exact keywords within both the same sentence or succeeding sentences.  The same word repeated in close proximity creates an unnatural awkwardness.  Use synonyms and other alternatives, instead of repeating the same terms.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/achieve-sentence-fluency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Long Should A Paragraph Be?</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/long-paragraph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/long-paragraph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paragraph length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paragraphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing paragraphs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no direct answer to how long a paragraph can be.  If you pick up one of those books from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no direct answer to how long a paragraph can be.  If you pick up one of those books from two centuries ago, for instance, you&#8217;ll easily find paragraphs running over an entire page, all while you&#8217;ll see many articles published in reputable websites with one or two sentences to a paragraph.</p>
<p>The fact is, there&#8217;s no right or wrong number.  It all depends on the factors surrounding the paper you are writing.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Many novels tend to use short      paragraphs with four to five sentences to speed up the pace.</li>
<li>Reference books will often      feature paragraphs that run the entire page.</li>
<li>Newspaper stories frequently      employ single-sentence paragraphs for brevity and impact.</li>
</ul>
<p>For the purposes of school papers, we recommend sticking to four to five sentences per paragraph.  There are many good reasons to do so</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Teachers check a lot of      papers.  The longer your paragraphs,      the slower your paper will be to read.       The shorter they are, the less of a chore it will be for the      teacher to finish reading.</li>
<li>Short paragraphs are easier      to understand.  Because the      discussion is limited to a few key ideas before a long pause, there&#8217;s not      a whole of material to ingest in one fell swoop.  The longer your paragraphs get, the more      the reader will have to work to tie everything together.</li>
<li>Readers focus better with      short paragraphs.  Because it      quickens the pace, short paragraphs feel a lot more pleasant to read.  Plus, teachers can skim if they want to      check your primary points without worrying that they might miss something      important.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/long-paragraph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Are No Bad Topics, Just Bad Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/bad-topics-bad-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/bad-topics-bad-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad writing topics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, writers blame their topic when their work isn&#8217;t quite up to task.  While some topics are, admittedly, tougher than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, writers blame their topic when their work isn&#8217;t quite up to task.  While some topics are, admittedly, tougher than others, the quality of a paper almost universally relies on the kind of work you put in.  Basically, it&#8217;s not about bad topics &#8212; it&#8217;s about bad writing.</p>
<p>When faced with a difficult topic, here are some things you should do:</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Find a fresh angle.   Try attacking the topic from a new      angle, one that hasn&#8217;t been done to death in other papers.  Remember: there&#8217;s always more than one      way of telling a story.  Explore and      discover.</li>
<li>Tell it in your own      voice.   Let your personality shine      in your writing.  Sometimes,      expressing the material in your own voice, tone and point of view is      enough to make the work stand out.</li>
<li>Know what you&#8217;re writing      about.   If a topic sounds hard, it      could be that you&#8217;re just lacking the knowledge to sufficiently work with      it.  Learn more and your whole way      of looking at it could change.</li>
<li>Be entertaining.  People read for a variety of reasons,      but they won&#8217;t stick around unless they&#8217;re entertained in some way.  If you approach the writing task with      the goal of entertaining the reader, you could really end up communicating      the topic in a more compelling way.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/bad-topics-bad-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Present Your Headlines And Subheadings</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/present-headlines-subheading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/present-headlines-subheading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presenting headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subheadings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing headlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many strategies you can take when composing your headlines and subheadings, from asking provocative questions to making a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many strategies you can take when composing your headlines and subheadings, from asking provocative questions to making a direct announcement.  That&#8217;s not what this is about.  Instead, this post is about approaches you should take when presenting those headlines.</p>
<p><strong>Capitalization. </strong> There are several styles you can use when writing out headlines and subheadings.  You can use title case, sentence case or whatever other format you&#8217;re accustomed, too.  Within the same article, any of them should do, provided you stay consistent throughout the document (or across your website, if you&#8217;re producing online content).</p>
<p><strong>Fragments. </strong> You can write headlines and subheadings as sentences or fragments.  As with capitalization, though, the only requirement is that you stay consistent throughout.</p>
<p><strong>Punctuation. </strong> Don&#8217;t bother with periods in headings and subheadings.  You can use commas, dashes, question marks, exclamation points or even parenthesis if necessary.  As a rule, though, you want to be stingy with their use.  The more barren of punctuation your headlines and subheadings are, the better.</p>
<p><strong>Parallel Structure.</strong> Normally, you will write several subheadings in a piece of writing.   While not required, it&#8217;s usually good practice to write them in a parallel format.  Doing so will avoid sloppy constructions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/present-headlines-subheading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Remove Bias In Your Use Of Language</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/remove-bias-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/remove-bias-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusive language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biased language is not all that unacceptable in writing.  In fact, most people are likely to give you a pass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biased language is not all that unacceptable in writing.  In fact, most people are likely to give you a pass than to go after your throat if you err to that end once or twice.  Regardless, bias in language can be a central concern for many readers, so it&#8217;s best to steer clear of it if you can.</p>
<p><strong>Gender Use</strong></p>
<p>Only use gender terms when they are accurate to the people you are addressing.  If a group can consist of more than one gender, then don&#8217;t use either masculine or feminine forms to address them, opting for plural pronouns or more inclusive nouns instead.</p>
<p><strong>Attaching Labels</strong></p>
<p>Labels that you attach to people are inherently biased.  Calling a group of research subjects as &#8220;disabled,&#8221; &#8220;nerds&#8221; or &#8220;obese&#8221; may be appropriate in the context of your paper, but it doesn&#8217;t diminish the fact that it demonstrates bias towards certain persons.</p>
<p>As a rule, you should avoid labeling whenever possible.  If unavoidable, then take careful considerations of the various factors  that surround both the label in question, the people concerned and your readers.    Your first resort should be to call a group of people what they prefer to be called, especially when it comes to race and ethnicity.   Beyond that, just be aware of how your choice of words can come across to the people reading your work.</p>
<p><strong>Alternative Descriptions</strong></p>
<p>There are always alternative terminologies you can use to describe people you address in your writing.  Always try out a few and see if they fit.  Doing so can help you avoid the whole mess of bias, instead of constantly teetering on the brink of offending a certain segment of readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/remove-bias-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want Your Writing To Have A Tighter Focus?  Start With The Ending</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/writing-tighter-focus-start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/writing-tighter-focus-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drafting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start with the ending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writing the ending of your articles and stories first might sound like a silly idea.    After all, we tend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing the ending of your articles and stories first might sound like a silly idea.    After all, we tend to think of writing as a sequential thing &#8212; you start with an introduction and explore the subject before doling out a conclusion.  Doing so, however, brings plenty of benefits that could make it worth your while to try it.</p>
<p>These two are probably the most important of those benefits:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>It forces you to fully      understand the topic.   In order to      write the ending, you must know what kind of points you&#8217;re going to make      and what evidence you have to support them.  If you&#8217;ve been skipping the outlining      process in your previous writing activities, this will likely force you to      start doing them, since it&#8217;s one of the few ways you can clarify how the      ending should go.</li>
<li>It gives your writing      direction.  Once you&#8217;ve written the      ending, you know exactly where your writing is going.  As such, your writing ends up tighter,      as you have a clear path where you want to take your reader.  Your ideas don&#8217;t float around aimlessly;      instead, they have an exact place they&#8217;re headed to.</li>
</ul>
<p>What if the ending you&#8217;ve written isn&#8217;t actually the best way to finish the piece?  Then rewrite it.   The purpose of doing the ending first is to focus your mental faculties towards an end point for your work, not to stifle your ability to craft a solid paper.  If, during the course of the draft, you find a better alternative, then alter it and use that to shape the rest of the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/writing-tighter-focus-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

