<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grammar Software &#187; revising your copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/tag/revising-your-copy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some Revising Issues You Might Encounter</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-issues-encounter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-issues-encounter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improve writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising your copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New to revising your writing?  Don&#8217;t worry, we all thought we could write first drafts that read flawlessly (or, at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New to revising your writing?  Don&#8217;t worry, we all thought we could write first drafts that read flawlessly (or, at most, required nothing more than a <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">grammar checker</a>), only to discover the world didn&#8217;t exactly work the way we imagine it.</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Refusal to remove any part of      your work.  This one&#8217;s common,      especially for unseasoned writers who have worked laboriously on a      piece.  Upon closer inspection, it      may be in your best interest to cut out certain paragraphs and eliminate a      few parts, but the pain of having to strip something you&#8217;ve worked so hard      to do just makes it overly difficult.</li>
<li>Falling in love with your      writing.  One writer I met gave me      this advice: find your favorite passage in every draft you write and      remove it.  While I still do feel      that&#8217;s taking it too far, the message is clear &#8211; if you fall in love with      your writing, you cannot objectively examine it.  In this case, setting the work aside for      some period of time (like a day or so) should help.  Of course, the part about throwing away      your favorite passage can work too.</li>
<li>Too much rewriting      necessary.  This usually happens      when you review your work and end up with serious doubts about your      primary points.  You have several      choices in this situation: you can pray the reader doesn&#8217;t notice, change      your work completely to reflect your new viewpoint or simply acknowledge      the contradiction.  The first one      can lead to disaster; the second will probably take too long than you have      time for; the third lets you keep your work intact, although you&#8217;ll need      to provide a reason why it still holds up, despite the existence of      issues.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-issues-encounter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Snatch Victory From The Jaws Of Disastrous Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/snatch-victory-jaws-disastrous-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/snatch-victory-jaws-disastrous-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[article writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disastrous writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising your copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You spent the last week working on your planning and drafting stages, putting your best effort into it.  Now, you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spent the last week working on your planning and drafting stages, putting your best effort into it.  Now, you&#8217;re editing your work and &#8211; oh my God &#8211; it sucks.  You can try using an <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">English writing assistant</a>, but if your piece is flawed in structure and content, it&#8217;s not likely to be of much help.  What are you gonna do?</p>
<p>Every writer worth the eye bags from his all-nighters has been there, so don&#8217;t worry.   Sometimes, no matter how hard you try, all that hard work manages to produce nothing but a dud.   It&#8217;s part of life.</p>
<p>When you chance upon such an unfortunate predicament, there are two general ways to go: start from the beginning or rescue what you can.  Obviously, if you&#8217;re pressed for time, the latter is your only likely option.</p>
<p><strong>Evaluate your writing organization. </strong>Did you present things in a timeline, order of importance or some other form of organization?  How would it look if you rearranged the presentation using a  different approach?  It could drastically change everything.</p>
<p><strong>Evaluate your arguments. </strong>Do your supporting arguments hold enough water to successfully carry the piece?   Are you hanging your central ideas on weak mounts?  Return to your outline and see how you can improve it.  A new paragraph that ties everything better may be all you need.</p>
<p><strong>Evaluate your main point. </strong> Is it clear enough for the reader?  More importantly, is it clear enough to you?  Try detaching yourself from the work and put yourself in your reader&#8217;s shoes.  Will you get the point based on what&#8217;s written alone?  If not, you may want to either simplify it or expound on your reasoning further.</p>
<p><strong>Evaluate your overall impact.</strong> Do your strongest materials appear up top?  Most people will read the beginning of your piece and decide whether to proceed.  If your best paragraph is nowhere near the top, there&#8217;s a good chance they&#8217;ll never get to it.  Similarly, look to end strong, as it will help leave a more lasting impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/snatch-victory-jaws-disastrous-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revising The Complete Piece</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-complete-piece/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-complete-piece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising your copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s bad form, but it&#8217;s true.  Most writers revise by crawling through their work section by section.  Some do it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad form, but it&#8217;s true.  Most writers revise by crawling through their work section by section.  Some do it after every sentence; some after every paragraph; others, every time they notice something while they draft.  While perfectly valid, it&#8217;s absolutely slow &#8211; far from the most efficient way of churning out copy.</p>
<p>How do you make your process faster?  Draft the entire piece, ignoring the desire to edit in real time.  Only revise and edit once you&#8217;ve finished with your first pass on the whole thing.  Finish before you correct; get it done before getting it right.</p>
<p>Apart from the speed, revising the complete piece brings another benefit.  You revise the work as a whole, rather than as individual parts.  That way, you already have a unified vision in mind before you even begin making changes.</p>
<p>Since you&#8217;re looking to edit efficiently, you may as well do the whole process right.  Start editing for structure, trying to determine if your ideas flow in a manner that allows the reader the best chance to digest them.  After that work on your transitions, carefully crafting how well each new topic segues into the other.  Only after that should you even consider using a <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">grammar checking software</a> and working at each individual sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/revising-complete-piece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Crucial Is Revising Your Copy?</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/crucial-revising-copy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/crucial-revising-copy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spell checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading your copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising your copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of writers I know still don&#8217;t bother revising their copy, even with just a good English grammar software.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of writers I know still don&#8217;t bother revising their copy, even with just a good <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">English grammar software</a>.  Bloggers are especially notorious, contending that such attention to detail is hardly necessary, much less warranted, for such an informal medium.</p>
<p><strong>Laziness</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s only for possible reason to refuse to revise your copy and that&#8217;s utter laziness.  As busy as your schedule might be and as pressed for time as you are, there are always opportunities to revise.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">grammar software</a> will take no more than a few minutes to run, even for long essays that span ten thousand words.  Will it really take more than thirty minutes to read through your 2,000-word article and clear up confusing parts?</p>
<p><strong>Benefits Of Revising Your Copy</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Revising ensures that your presentation is sound.</strong> How do you know that what you&#8217;ve written stands up to what you&#8217;ve originally intended for the material?  Reading through your text with an open mind is the only way to ensure it.<br />
<strong><br />
Revising makes sure you will be understood. </strong> Grammar errors and poor sentence structures not only make you look amateurish, they turn your copy into a difficult-to-understand mess.  The most well-meaning ideas will fail when expressed in an unclear manner &#8211; a serious problem that a good grammar software can easily fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/crucial-revising-copy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

