<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grammar Software &#187; professional proofreader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/tag/professional-proofreader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:37:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Proofreading Should Not Be Your Job</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/proofreading-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/proofreading-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grammar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional proofreader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarsoftware.com/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a writer, you should focus your energies on writing and leave proofing off your hands.  Proofreading your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a writer, you should focus your energies on writing and leave proofing off your hands.  Proofreading your own stuff is the easiest way to leave mistakes in, making it just a bad idea overall.</p>
<p><strong>Hiring A Proofreader</strong></p>
<p>What&#8217;s the best way to guarantee that your text is proofread in the best way possible?  Hire a professional to do it.  More than being a fresh pair of eyes, those who do this for a living will likely have come across a multitude of the typical errors most writers make.  For the most part, they&#8217;ll know exactly what to watch out for.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t afford paying someone else to do it, try getting a fellow writer to do it as a favor.  Even if you consider yourself a more complete writer than them, they will be in a better position to proofread your piece.  After slaving over a 10,000 word article, it&#8217;s just difficult to gather your wits and read your own work in an objective manner.</p>
<p><strong>Using A Software</strong></p>
<p>While getting an extra hand is ideal, it&#8217;s not always the most available option.  Some people just happen to live in a cave and don&#8217;t really have anyone who can help them out.  In these cases, a <a href="http://www.grammarsoftware.com">proofreading software</a> should prove extremely helpful.</p>
<p>Like all proofreading options, don&#8217;t expect it to catch everything.  However, I guarantee that using software will turn up a better copy than doing it all by yourself ever could.  Even better, it can get those results at a considerably faster rate.</p>
<p><strong>Putting In Your Own Work</strong></p>
<p>This is not to say that you should spend any time proofing your own piece.  The point is that doing it all on your own is a dangerous exercise that is easily avoidable.  By all means, fix your writing &#8211; just make sure to employ available alternatives as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarsoftware.com/blog/proofreading-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

